Since the first one opened in St. Paul, Minnesota in 1992, charter schools have captivated school reformers, originally on the political right but increasingly from the center-left. Largely an urban phenomenon, charter schools in some 70 plus cities now enroll 10 percent or more of public school students in 2010, up from 45 cities three years ago, according to the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.
Charters serve over 1.5 million children across 40 states and the District of Columbia.
Forty states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that allow for charter schools, resulting in 5,400 operating in the 2010-11 school year, according to the Center for Education Reform (CER). The laws vary considerably in composition. CER says that only three — Washington, DC, Minnesota and California — have laws that provide optimal conditions for the establishment, growth and success of charters. Only nine other states have strong laws on the books and have seen demonstrated student achievement gains.
CER states that charter schools across the United States are funded at 61 percent of their district counterparts, averaging $6,585 per pupil compared to $10,771 per pupil at conventional district public schools.
The charter movement includes many well-known celebrities and billionaires, including New York hedge fund managers and the singers John Legend and Sting, who performed at a fundraiser for Harlem charter schools at Lincoln Center. Charters have also become a pet cause of what one education historian calls a billionaires’ club of philanthropists, including Bill Gates, Eli Broad of Los Angeles and the Walton family of Wal-Mart.
Oregon Charter School Laws
Oregon’s charter law, passed in 1999, allows start-up charter schools, as well as public school and alternative education program conversions. A charter school in Oregon is a public school operated by a group of parents, teachers and/or community members as a semi-autonomous school of choice within a school district. It is given the authority to operate under a contract or “charter” between the members of the charter school community and the local board of education. The school must be nonsectarian. A public charter school is a school of choice. Students may choose to attend the charter school even if the school is not in their attendance area. Applications may not be submitted to convert an existing private school into a charter school.
The law provides for a Charter School Development Fund consisting of federal and other funds for charter school development. The law also requires districts to make available lists of vacant and unused public and private buildings for charter school facilities.
CER ranks Oregon’s charter school law 21st weakest of the nation’s 41 laws, with an overall grade of “C.” The CER Web site gives an brief rundown of the Oregon Charter School law to include operational autonomy.
Here is what the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools says about the Oregon charter school law.
There are efforts to change the law. In the 2011 legislative session House Bill 2287 was introduced. House Bill 2287 would tweak the process for creating a charter school under a decade-old law allowing the publicly funded, privately run institutions in Oregon. It would require a five-year contract for new schools, limit a school board’s ability to ask for more information from charter seekers and eliminate a requirement that community groups be involved in the planning of a charter school. It also would allow organizations proposing a new charter school to appeal to the state Board of Education if they feel the school district isn’t negotiating in good faith or is delaying the process. Oregon Stand for Children chapter voted to support House Bill 2287 with some amendments, giving the bill’s chances at success a boost. On Monday, March 14, the bill was defeated 32-28. In the vote, 29 Democrats and three Republicans opposed the bill. Those Republicans were three of only five Republicans supported by the teachers union in the last election.
Enrollment In the 2009-10 school year, there were 101 charter schools (up from 89 charter schools in 2008-09), with approximately 18,461 students enrolled. This is an increase of 4,090 students from the previous year when 14,371 students were enrolled. Of the 76 charter schools that received an AYP rating, 79% received an overall Met rating, compared to 70% of all rated Oregon schools that received an overall Met rating. The 79% Met in charter schools was an increase from 60% Met in 2006-07 and 64% Met in 2007-08.
Do Charter Schools Work?
The majority of the 5,000 or so charter schools nationwide appear to be no better, and in many cases worse, than local public schools when measured by achievement on standardized tests, according to experts citing years of research. In 2009 one of the most comprehensive studies, by researchers from Stanford University, found that fewer than one-fifth of charter schools nationally offered a better education than comparable local schools, almost half offered an equivalent education and more than a third, 37 percent, were “significantly worse.”
Although “charter schools have become a rallying cry for education reformers,” the report, by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes, warned, “this study reveals in unmistakable terms that, in the aggregate, charter students are not faring as well” as students in traditional schools.
What most experts can agree on is that charter school quality varies widely, and that it is often associated with the rigor of authorities that grant charters. New York, where oversight is strong, is known for higher performing schools. Ohio, Arizona and Texas, where accountability is minimal, showed up in the author’s study with many poorly performing schools. Its author, Margaret E. Raymond, is a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a bastion of libertarianism. Ms. Raymond’s study did show that learning improved the longer students were in charters.
Successful Charter Schools
Researchers for the Raymond study and others pointed to a successful minority of charter schools — numbering perhaps in the hundreds — and these are the ones around which celebrities and philanthropists rally, energized by their narrowing of the achievement gap between poor minority students and white students.
The differences in how schools are run, the way classes are taught and how school culture is nourished are striking. Successful charters show that high- and low-performing schools often seem to operate alike. They require student uniforms, a longer day and academic year, frequent testing to measure learning, and tutoring for students who fall behind. They imitate one another in superficial ways, too, like hanging inspirational banners.
From a few yeas of experience in operating charter schools in low income neighborhoods, a playbook is emerging. It turns out you need government accreditation to drive quality, and the human capital to make schools go. The lesson for success is dependent on human capital.
A source to understanding how difficult it is to change the lives of poor children is a book calledWhatever It Takes authored by Paul Tough. Geoffrey Canada, if you haven’t heard of him already, is the man behind the Harlem Children’s Zone Project, a hugely ambitious effort to improve lives in a 97-block swath of New York City. The book will change your understanding of poverty.
In 2007, President George W. Bush visited a Harlem charter, but President Obama has done him one better, pledging to use the Harlem Children’s Zone, as a model for high-poverty urban areas. The administration’s Race to the Top competition, which waves the carrot of $4.3 billion in education aid to states that comply with administration goals, has prompted three so far — Illinois, Louisiana and Tennessee — to lift limits on the number of charter schools. Advocates say there has never been more political momentum from Washington in favor of charter schools.
Nonprofit networks of charter operators with top-flight schools — outfits like Uncommon, KIPP and Aspire Public Schools — have created about 350 in the past decade and required $500 million in philanthropic support, according to Thomas Toch, author of a study on many of the groups underwritten by the New Schools Venture Fund. He questioned whether successful charters could be “scaled up” without sacrificing quality and without heavy subsidies from private donors.
Study Says KIPP Charter Schools Has Financial Advantage
Most charter schools receive less government money for each student, on average, than traditional public schools. But the KIPP network (Knowledge is Power Program), one of the fastest-growing and academically successful charter groups, has received more taxpayer dollars per student than regular public schools, according to a study by Western Michigan University released in March of 2011.
The study also noted that KIPP receives substantial amounts of private philanthropic money. Kipp, a network of 99 schools in 20 states and the District of Columbia, has attracted more academic research than many other charter groups because of its success in raising the academic achievement of poor students, especially African-American youths. The Department of Education last year awarded KIPP a $50 million grant to finance its growth.
By analyzing Department of Education databases for the 2007-8 school year, the researchers calculated that the KIPP network received $12,731 in taxpayer money per student, compared with $11,960 at the average traditional public school and $9,579, on average, at charter schools nationwide. In addition, KIPP generated $5,760 per student from private donors, the study said, based on a review of KIPP’s nonprofit filings with the Internal Revenue Service.
Obstacles to Starting a Charter School in Portland
There is no doubt that teachers’ unions as well as many school districts are not fans of charters. Critics of charter schools and their political allies say the schools rely on a corps of young teachers who are willing to work 60-hour weeks, but who burn out quickly.
Take the case of an attempt to secure a charter school in the Portland Public Schools (PPS) a few years ago by parents in Southwest Portland. The parents were mainly from the neighborhood of Smith Elementary that closed in June 2005. The parents wanted to create a charter elementary school in their own vision and pattern it after a couple of successful environmental schools. PPS rejected their application so the parents took advantage of the Oregon Charter School law whereas charter schools denied sponsorship by their local districts have the option to appeal to the state board of education for sponsorship. The organizers applied to the Oregon Department of Education and were promptly approved − Southwest Charter was now official. The Southwest Charter School organizers then approached PPS about renting Smith Elementary. PPS offered the charter school the Smith building for $40,000 a month rent. $40,000 a month was too expensive and it seemed PPS would rather have that space empty than rent to a charter school at a reasonable rent so Southwest Charter was forced to rent space in a office building. PPS admitted it would compete with them for students in Southwest Portland.
Smith Elementary sits vacant today and the only revenue that PPS earned was a short-term lease to another school district while that district remodeled their K-8 school. They claimed they need the building as a backup to house students in case one of the PPS school building need remodeling.
Most of these facts about the efforts to obtain accreditation for Southwest Charter were documented in an article dated October 30, 2009 in the Portland Tribune. We did learned about the $40,000 rent from a charter school advocate.
There are eleven charters schools that are within Portland Public School district as of 2011. See PPS charter schools for a list. Southwest Charter and The Ivy School, the two schools within the PPS district and that were approved by the Oregon Department of Education are not on the list. PPS refuses to acknowledge their existence even though these two schools are within the PPS district. You can read reviews about Southwest Charter at the Great Schools website.
Of the 25 applications for charter school sponsorship since 1999, the Portland school board has approved 11 and rejected 10. The 10 rejections are more than all other districts in the state combined.
How a Charter School Saved Elkton, Oregon From Losing Its School
When newly hired superintendent Mike Hughes arrived in Elkton overlooking the Umpqua River in 2008, Elkton School District was dying. With dwindling enrollment and a state funding crisis, Hughes told community members the 130-student K-12 school would likely have to close its doors within two to three years. Now, nearly three years later, Elkton has new computers, new curriculum and materials and nearly 80 new students.
What changed? Elkton became a charter school. Elkton School District is one of a growing number of rural and remote school districts in Oregon that are using the charter school law to survive.
Throughout the Portland metropolitan area, school districts have cut school days, eliminated teaching positions and programs to cope with declines in state revenue and federal support. In rural areas, though, a similar decline in revenue can completely wipe out a district’s transportation staff, counselor and math and science teachers.
Oregon’s charter school law, intended to be an avenue of innovation, prevents districts from turning all their schools into charters. But if the district has only one K-12 school, state law provides an exception. And with the charter school designation comes access to $500,000 federal grants and fewer state requirements. It’s a little-used clause in the charter school law but becoming more common. The number of Oregon districts making the switch has more than doubled to 12 since 2008. Three single-school districts have alerted the Oregon Department of Education they intend to apply for 2011 federal charter school grants.
With the school’s walking distance proximity to the Umpqua River, Hughes created a natural resources-focused academy. At the elementary school building, students are making use of a long-defunct land lab that allows kids to follow trails to an area where they can study soil samples, mold, fungus, leaves and trees. High schoolers are visiting estuaries and preparing to start two local businesses. “I’m not a science person at all,” said Kodye Harvey, 15. “But we’re getting the hands-on experience. We’re getting out of the classroom and it makes it real.”
The kids keep coming. Already, enrollment has surpassed what Hughes outlined in his five-year plan. In the 2008-09 school year, the district enrolled about 130 kids and this year, the school hit 200. Charter schools in Triangle Lake, Imbler and North Powder have also experienced enrollment growth since becoming charter schools. Increased enrollment increases state funding. But, as these districts become charters to ensure their own survival, it has created tense relationships with neighbors.
Elkton is sending school buses into five neighboring districts to pick up students. One superintendent said he was appalled and offended by Hughes’ action. Enrollment has also been a point of contention between adjacent Imbler and La Grande school districts and between North Powder and Baker schools.
Source: “Oregon’s rural schools look to charter status to survive,” by Kimberly Melton. December 17, 2010 The Oregonian.
Charter Schools in the Portland Area
The Center for Advanced Learning (CAL) is a regional public secondary education system, which extends learning opportunities for students attending the high schools of Centennial, Corbett, Gresham-Barlow and Reynolds school districts. It is the largest charter school (about 500 students) in the metro area. Students attend classes at their home campuses every other day and come to the charter school on the off days for specialized classes. At CAL, students take advanced courses in three technology-based fields: information technology, medical/health sciences, and engineering/advanced manufacturing.
CM2 Opal School was founded in 2001. Today the school has 80 students in grades K through 5 in three classrooms at the Children’s Museum in Washington Park. Influenced by the early childhood centers in Reggio Emilia, Italy, the approach is based on listening rather than speaking and thinking that children have the ability to build their own learning. In addition to the charter school, the museum is also home to the Museum School, a for-fee preschool and early kindergarten program, and the Center for Children’s Learning, a research institution that studies education strategies and brain development in children.
Here are other charter schools in the metro area.
Waiting for Superman
For an entertaining evening, watch Waiting for Superman. Filmmaker Davis Guggenheim reminds us that education “statistics” have names: Anthony, Francisco, Bianca, Daisy, and Emily, whose stories make up the engrossing foundation of the movie. It follows a handful of promising kids through a system that inhibits, rather than encourages, academic growth, Guggenheim undertakes an exhaustive review of public education, surveying “drop-out factories” and “academic sinkholes,” methodically dissecting the system and its seemingly intractable problems.
Critics say much-hyped education documentary unfairly targets teachers unions and promotes charter schools.
A book entitled Whatever It Takesauthored by Paul Tough will change your understanding of poverty. It’s the story of Geoffrey Canada ambitious effort to improve lives in a 97-block swath of New York City,